By Julius Kapwepwe Mishambi
Published: 13th January 2016
1) China Railway Corporation and Globalisation
Compared to countries in Europe, America and elsewhere, China has globally demonstrated affordable, yet reliable, railway infrastructural technology. Turkish high speed railway network commissioned in July 2014 and similar undertakings within China attest to this. China already scooped mega lucrative projects like the $14.2 billion double-track 1,435mm East African Community Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) system: Mombasa port through Kenya, Uganda, Burundi, Rwanda and South Sudan, for 120 km/h as passengers and 80-100 km/h goods trains. Some sections by Chinese Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC) may be complete in 2018, with Uganda’s initial cost of $3.3billion.
Others include Ethiopia and high speed railway projects in Myanmar, U.S (Los Angeles to Las Vegas), Russia, Montenegro and United Kingdom. Here, Chinese companies and financial-related institutions (e.g. Export and Imperial Bank of China-EXIM and BRICS Bank) are increasingly the favoured contractors, financiers, suppliers of equipment/ technology and human power (www.globalconstructionreview.com/news/china ).
2) China in Africa beyond railways
Beyond railways, Chinese firms are designing, developing and maintaining roads, aviation, ports, military installations and equipment. Others are hydropower dams, water transport and attendant infrastructure. The cost is, of course, borne by recipient nations or enterprises. Over 2,500 Chinese companies have already invested in Africa.
3) 6th Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) and take away
As 15 African Presidents joined the Chinese President Xi Jinping for the 6th Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) during December 2015 in South Africa, Chinese Railway Corporation engaged twenty countries, mainly from Eastern Europe, over high speed railway projects. The struggle to improve infrastructure globally to kick-start or enhance economic development is on. African infrastructural deficit alone stands at $90 billion annually. All these realities are amidst Chinese economic appetite to get back to a decade-old average economic growth rate of at least 8%.
The above partly informed the Chinese President’s announcing during 2015 FOCAC, a $60 billion package- due 2015-2018 across selected African nations. Most Chinese debt repayment has been based on commodity modalities linked to Africa’s extractive industry. From 2015 FOCAC, South Africa parted with $6.5 billion, EAC $2.7 billion ($1.5 billion to Kenya and even with an outstanding $1.3 billion Chinese debt; then $1.2 billion to Uganda). Ironically, South Africa and other nations that attracted biggest packages are the most indebted to China, while Kenya is leading in EAC.
4) More questions on Debt contraction, Transparency and Absorption capacities
Africa’s debt to China so far staggers at over $30 billion. Even with zero-interest on selected existing loans and concessional terms in some new cases, it points to further Africa’s dependency on China. So, are African resources being mortgaged, e.g. oil resources and discoveries in Kenya and Uganda? Where is Parliament; and other due process for stakeholders’ involvement- for wider transparency in such packages? How do we minimise low loan absorption issues as already presented by Auditor Generals?
5) Case of China and Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) in Uganda
SGR project in Uganda already suffered allegations of procurement malpractices and inflated cost, with a Parliamentary report and MPs ask court to block the project (e.g. Daily Monitor 6th July 2015, page 5). Such seems an African narrative involving Chinese companies. How do we rebuild citizens’ trust in public sector procurement and management? Or even debt that contributes to desired African economic outcomes? Amidst such, how do we position Uganda to benefit from China’s globally proven affordable railway construction and management technology?
6) Which way?
Now with resources from 2015 FOCAC to Uganda’s infrastructural projects, let’s support President Museveni particularly to deliver SGR. Its success cuts across traders, industrialists and agriculturalists. Uganda Revenue Authority will increase revenue collection by undercutting corruption scale at weigh-bridges on roads. Let’s meaningfully learn from Chinese global successes and also meet our EAC and African targets. Even at 80-100 km/h, railway remains the fastest means in goods haulage. Timely SGR project delivery contribute to Uganda’s Vision 2040 of transforming from low income of $686 (IMF, 2014) to $9,500 per capita by 2040; as well as EAC and the wider African development paradigm.
The writer is the Director of Programmes at Uganda Debt Network
By Stella Obel Negesa
Published: 10th December 2015
Yesterday, December 9, Uganda joined the rest of the world to commemorate the International Anti-Corruption Day. In Uganda, the Anti-Corruption Day is a culmination of a national anti-corruption week that commenced on December 2.
The civil society theme on, “Say No to Vote selling and buying” could not be timelier than yesterday.
Corruption has led to diversion of scarce public resources to private projects, at the expense of much needed public services including schools, hospitals, roads and clean water. Corruption therefore hurts the economy and aggravates the impoverishment of citizens, especially the poor and marginalised.
Tororo Anti-Corruption Coalition (TAC) routinely engages in community based monitoring of utilization of public resources intended for implementation of government programs, and social services in Tororo district. During the course of community monitoring, numerous incidences of corruption have been unearthed, which are detrimental to improvement of the quality of life of the poor.
For example on 1st December when TAC Monitors visited Tororo District Local Government Referral Hospital and established that mothers’ Mama Kits which are supposed to be given out free of charge to expectant mothers, were being sold at varied costs ranging between shs. 5,000 to Shs.30,000, depending on the status of an expectant mother.
Extortion of money from mothers, commonly practiced in most Health Centre IIIs and IVs, coupled with charges on mothers per delivery, has discouraged many mothers from seeking medical services from these facilities, who instead resort to unsafe delivery in their homes, resulting into high maternal mortality rate.
Another case followed up by community monitors in 2015 involved one, Odoi Alfred Peter who obtained goods by false pretense contrary to section 305 of Penal Code Act. He was taken to Court in Tororo and remanded in Morukatipe Government Prison Case.
On 31st March, he appeared before the Grade One Magistrate and applied for Court bail, and the condition he was given was that he pays the trial Magistrate sh2m which he then paid through the Court Clerk. However instead of being given Court bail, he was granted Bail Bond for his release. In September 2015, during a consultative dialogue with stakeholders by the Chief Justice to ascertain how administration of justice is dispensed in Courts of law within the Chief Magistrate’s jurisdiction, Odoi raised this case with the Chief Justice who promised to follow up the matter.
Still, another scenario was in Magola Sub-County, Tororo, during a training conducted for local Community members under the Operation Wealth Creation program, Community Members were told to apply for coffee seedlings enough to cover one and more acres, estimated to be 68 seedlings.
Shortly thereafter, when the seedlings were brought, the community members who applied for the coffee seedlings were instead given seedlings ranging from 10 - 50 seedlings. The delivery was contrary to the information passed on during the training. No explanations were given to communities about the variance in the delivery of coffee seedlings, much to their disgruntlement and confusion.
As we commemorate the International Anti-corruption Day this week, it is crucial to note that if government programs and service delivery projects are to have the desired impact in transforming the livelihoods of the rural folk, citizens need to be continually empowered to reject corrupt tendencies and practices in their communities, and hold their leaders accountable at both local and national levels.
The writer is the coordinator of Tororo Anti-Corruption Coalition and board member of Uganda Debt Network
By Adellah Agaba
Published: 9th December 2015
Corruption is the behaviour on the part of officials in the public sector, whether politicians or civil servants, in which they improperly and unlawfully enrich themselves, or those close to them, by the misuse of the public power entrusted to them. This would include embezzlement of funds, theft of corporate or public property as well as corrupt practices such as bribery, extortion or influence peddling. The political pronouncements notwithstanding, corruption continues to present one of the biggest impediments to development in Uganda.
Key Government Officials during the Anti-Corruption Week launch: Inspector General of Government Mrs. Irene Mulyagonja, 3rd Deputy Prime Minister Hon. Kirunda Kivejinja and Auditor General Mr. John Muwanga.
Corruption in Uganda is said to be systemic and institutionalized. It is further observed that corruption and poor accountability is evident at all levels of governance. This is evident in instances like flouting of public procurement regulations; exercising undue influence in recruitment and promotions; bribery; misuse of funds; buying votes; forging academic papers, among others. Corruption has continued to flourish in every sector of society and the public is becoming immune to this evil to an extent of tolerating it while, oftentimes, the corrupt are admired. This has greatly contributed to the breakdown of the ethical values system of the society. It is not for the lack of strategies, laws or institutions that corruption has thrived; it is rather the lack of political will and commitment to the full implementation of the laws and policies.
UDN Staff during the launch of the Anti-Corruption Week in Kampala.
The participation of civil society in the fight against corruption remains relevant and CSOs have begun to organize themselves into inclusive and all-embracing nation-wide campaigns aimed at boosting their energies in the fight against corruption. The role of Parliament as the overall oversight institution of the State - in establishing ethics and integrity in public office and as the front-runner in demanding for accountability, open and transparent governance and in its ability to check excessive power of the State while representing the interests of the electorate - cannot be underestimated.
It is our duty to fight corruption together.